Van Keulen, Van Keuren, Van Kuren, Van Curen Home Page
In the early 1500s, Wolfaert van Keulen was born at or near Cologne (Keulen in Dutch). His son Mathij is believed to have been born in the 1540s, also Cologne. In 1567, Cologne was taken over by the Spanish. The Catholic conquerors were very hard on wealthy Protestants, imprisoning large numbers and executing many. As the van Keulen family were both well off and Protestant, most chose to flee for the safety of the Netherlands. Mathij Wolfaertse van Keulen appeared first in the records of Antwerp in 1570. It is believed that his son, Jan Mathijs van Keulen was born in Antwerp @ 1580. In 1585, Antwerp fell to the Spanish. Nothing is known of Mathij Wolfaertse beyond this date, but brother Jacob Wolfaertse appeared in London in the early 1590s. Jan Mathijs' firstborn son Mathij Jansen van Keulen, was christened at the Austin Friars Dutch Reformed Church of London on 2 Feb, 1602, but Jan was listed as a merchant of Amsterdam. Subsequent records involving Jan Mathijs van Keulen and his family are found in the courts and churches of Amsterdam. Mathij Jansen van Keulen immigrated to America @ 1636, where he married Margiet Hendrickse, and they had 4 children. Mathij's grandchildren, through youngest son Matthys, adopted the surname "Van Keuren" in 1716, creating an artificial Dutch name. There has yet to be a Van Keuren, Van Kuren, or Van Curen that is verified to be a descendant of any immigrant other than Mathij Jansen van Keulen. |
|
![]() |
|
|
D G Van Curen 1506 Rand St Boise, ID 83709 United States 208-376-5475 Vancuren53@aol.com |
|
Edit Your Page |
|
Family Photos |
|
|
|
Family Tree Maker Reports and Trees |
|
Related Files |
|
|
|
Related Links |
|
The content shown on this page has been submitted by a Genealogy.com customer, and is not subject to verification by Genealogy.com. Neither Genealogy.com nor its affiliates are responsible for the accuracy of any information contained on this page. The opinions expressed on this page are the author's alone and not the opinions of Genealogy.com.
|
|||||||||||
| © 2009 Ancestry.com |